NC Justice Center's Living Income Initiative E-mail Update

September 27 , 2002

Volume 2, Issue15

The Living Income Initiative is a special project of the NC Justice and Community Development Center. It is
supported completely through contributions and foundation support. You can contribute directly by mail at
Living Income Initiative, P.O. Box 28068, Raleigh, NC 27611. Email us at sorien@ncjustice.org

LIVING INCOME EMAIL UPDATE


BAD BILLS ON THE MOVE THIS WEEK

IN THIS ISSUE:
THE UGLY: ATTEMPTS TO GIVE OUT HUGE FAVORS TO FRIENDS
ALERT! EMAIL LEGISLATORS: NO CORPORATE GIVEAWAYS WHILE PROGRAMS ARE BEING CUT AND SALES TAX INCREASED
THE BAD: BIG LOSS FOR MIDDLE AND LOW INCOME AS SALES TAX INCREASE PASSES
THE GOOD: BIG WIN FOR CONSUMERS IN HOUSE ON PAYDAY LENDING BILL

You can get a copy of any bill or learn more about who represents you at the NC General Assembly web page


THE UGLY: ATTEMPTS TO GIVE OUT HUGE FAVORS TO FRIENDS

The low of the session came this week when the Senate revealed its amended business incentive bill (HB 1734) which gives out hundreds of million of dollars in grants, tax breaks and buildings to various businesses and groups. While such giveouts are not so unusual in themselves, they were particularly offensive after the months long budget debate where legislators said they had no other revenue available to fill the budget deficit and so had cut nearly $1 billion in programs, services and state jobs plus left another $100 million for the Governor still to cut. Also unsettling is the inclusion of a cut in some corporate tax rates only one day after increasing sales taxes which mostly affect low and middle-income individuals.

This is the bill that passed the House last week and primarily contained a new program with little oversight, that allows a small group of officials to hand out up to $15 million per year in grants to businesses to encourage them to create new jobs in NC. The reasoning for this is that other states are offering such grants and NC will lose new jobs if we don't offer them too. But as Kim Cartron of the NC Budget and Tax Center noted in testimony to the Senate Finance Committee, "to prove that these jobs would not come to NC but for these grants, we're going to need a sizable appropriation to the Psychic Friends Network because we'd have to be mind readers." That is because it is almost impossible to tell what motivates the creation of jobs, and many survey of executives have shown that incentives are not their primary consideration when deciding where to locate. This program is likely to cost the state over $500 million in the next 15 years.

Making the bill even worse are the additional Senate give aways, including:

A cut in the coporate tax rate amounting to a loss of $20 million per year in state revenues;

Creates travel and tourism grants which would be state grants to build stadiums, colloseums and other such venues;

Obligates for years significant portions of North Carolina’s tobacco settlement for specific building projects, and

Expands tax incentives for the film industry.

The House, in a very confusing procedural move, is holding meetings on a new bill (House BIll 1753) that includes just the parts of the Senate Bill that have not previously been reviewed by the House. They are doing this so they can begin to discuss the issues these Senate additions present without having to wait for the Senate to send over their bill. Presumably this is being done because they hope to adjourn by the end of next week and the House is trying to speed up the process. In a meeting today that went over the new Senate options, Representative Leslie Cox said, "This bill has a timing problem. We're trying to get out of here and this bill needs a month or more of discussion. I'm not sure it could pass the House even if we were here until December." Complaints were raised by several members about each of the new items and the members were invited to make amendments to the bill on Monday when it again will be heard in House Finance at 3:30 and House Appropriations after session Monday night. The Senate will vote on their version of the bill on Monday night.

Also in line to get some favors, in another bill about to become law (House Bill 1670), are the biggest banks in the state. Last year legislators closed a corporate tax loophole that had allowed many businesses to avoid paying millions in state taxes. The larger banks then realized this was going to affect them far more than they had previously thought, and so they have secured a cap on how much they will have to pay. Electric Utility companies will also benefit from limitations on how much they will have to pay in state taxes. These caps will mean an estimated loss of about $30 million per year to state revenues that otherwise would have been paid under this bill. Senate leaders said it is worth it, however, because the companies have agreed to pay the capped amounts within 15 days of the signing of this bill instead of challenging the loophole closure and paying nothing as they had begun to do. This seems to be tax policy at its worst - by coercion. Hardly a happy state of affairs during any time, and especially not now when the state is facing multi-billion dollar deficits every year.


IT IS TIME TO CONTACT YOUR STATE SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVES AND TELL THEM:

1)

IT IS INAPPROPRIATE TO GIVE MILLIONS OF STATE DOLLARS TO BUSINESSES WHILE CUTTING PROGRAMS FOR INDIVIDUALS AND RAISING THE SALES TAX;

2)

DO NOT PASS ANY BILLS THAT WOULD GIVE AWAY LIMITED STATE DOLLARS TO BUILDINGS AND BUSINESS IN THIS RUSHED METHOD AND POSSIBLY LEAVE THE STATE IN GREATER DEFICIT IN FUTURE YEARS.
  Go to the Covenant with NC’s Children website and send an e-mail message or letter to every member of the Committee with a few clicks of your mouse.

Use the suggested text or compose your own message. It ’s easy and quick.




(TOP)


THE BAD: BIG LOSS FOR MIDDLE AND LOW INCOME AS SALES TAX INCREASE PASSES

This week the legislature passed the bill giving local governments the option to collect another half-cent in sales tax in their county. (Senate Bill 1292) If counties take the option, it raises the total sales tax to 7 cents per dollar in all counties expect Mecklenburg where it will be 7 1/2 cents. Counties can add the half-cent starting December 1, 2002 and it is estimated to raise $188 million. This half-cent is on top of a half-cent increase made last year which is currently going toward the state coffers, but which is scheduled to end on July 1, 2003.

The sales tax passed after massive lobbying by local governments and their associations. They argued that they needed a source of new funding to replace the over $350 million of state moneys that was withheld by the state in order to help pay for the state budget deficit. Because of this loss of revenue many counties have made severe cuts to locally funded programs. While the sales tax will not completely refund the counties for the moneys lost, it will give them some new moneys this year and more next year when the sales tax will be in effect for the entire fiscal year. Clearly it is essential that programs necessary to serve the needs of residents must be fully funded, but the sales tax is not the only option to come up with the necessary money.

Legislators, however, told local governments that their only option to get any money this year was to add the half-cent sales tax. At the same time though, legislators are considering bills that would give out hundreds of millions to business including through a corporate tax cut. The sales tax increase once again piles more of the burden on low and middle income households to pay for the government services, programs and infrastructure that benefit all residents of North Carolina - including corporate residents.

In general, the sales tax is the most regressive tax in North Carolina's state and local tax system. It is important to keep in mind that any regressive tax changes in North Carolina would be layered on top of a tax system that already burdens the
lowest 20% of taxpayers more heavily than any other income category and places the smallest burden, as a % of income, on the those with the top 20% of incomes. As a % of income, the proposed additional 1/2 cent local sales tax would hit the bottom 20% of taxpayers 6 times harder than the top 1% of taxpayers and would hit the middle 20% of taxpayers 4 times harder than the top 1%. Adding to the burden of those least able to pay is a real low of the session. Legislators must now promise not to repeal the sunset of the state's half-cent sales tax when they come back next year to more substantial budget deficits. The cost of funding wanted and necessary state government must be paid by everyone, not just a voiceless few.

(TOP)


THE GOOD: BIG WIN FOR CONSUMERS IN HOUSE ON PAYDAY LENDING BILL

By Rob Schofield, NC Consumer Action Network, A Project of NC Justice & Community Development Center

It appears that the hard work of consumer advocates paid off on Wednesday as the House of Representatives voted 59-50 to dramatically amend the industry-backed payday lending bill (SB 104). The vote came after more than three hours of debate over two days. As folks will recall, the bill would have put North Carolina's permanent seal of approval on the inherently abusive practice of 14 day payday loans (also called "deferred deposit transactions"). Last year, lawmakers allowed a four-year experimental law on the subject to expire after it was shown that the practice had become predatory for the vast majority of borrowers. The bill proposed by the industry during the waning days of the current session would have reinstated the basic model abandoned last year by allowing lenders to make an unlimited number of back to back, two-week loans to borrowers with effective annual interest rates of 390%.

The key vote came on a proposed floor amendment by Rep. Mickey Michaux of Durham that proposed to limit any payday loan to an effective annual interest rate of 100% apr. As a practical matter, the amendment would have required either much longer loan terms (on the order of 55 days), much reduced fees, or a combination of both. The amendment was adopted
after an extended debate in which folks from across the ideological spectrum weighed in on both sides. While consumer advocates are now prepared to support the bill with only a few additional modifications, the payday industry appears to have rejected this possibility and it APPEARS there will be no further action on the measure. Speaker Jim Black announced today that lawmakers are aiming to adjourn for the year late next week.



Return to Top

CONTACTS & LINKS

Living Income Email Update and Advocacy
Sorien K. Schmidt 919-856-2151 sorien@ncjustice.org
Living Income Research and Grassroots Campaigns
Kim Cartron 919-856-3193
kim@ncjustice.org
Living Income Grassroots Education and Organizing
Sheila Kingsberry Burt 919-856-3194 sheila@ncjustice.org
Elaine Mejia
NCJCDC Budget & Tax Center
How to Take Action The Living Income Agenda (PDF)
Subscribe to the Living Income Email Update Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) Fact Sheet Living Income Fact Sheet
Working for a Good Living Workshop brochure (PDF) Learn more about public assistance in North Carolina. North Carolina EITC Tax claims by county and as a percent of income tax filers for 1998.