As
the General Assembly limps toward the finish line of another, seemingly
endless legislative session, North Carolina is at a dangerous crossroads.
Worn down by months of bickering and an overpowering desire to simply
get things over with, lawmakers appear to be on the verge of adopting
a 2002-2003 "budget bill" that will have disastrous effects
for decades to come. It is absolutely essential that North Carolinians
of all political persuasions stand up and call on their elected officials
to stop -- before it's too late.
What
is the big problem? State government is in fiscal crisis.
A decade of large and repeated tax cuts has combined with national economic
recession to depress state revenues dramatically. Effectively, the state
is broke and cannot pay for all the things to which it has committed
itself.
How
did we get in this fix? For decades, North Carolina maintained
a proud tradition of progressive and fiscally responsible budget policy
that made us a model for states throughout the southeast. This tradition
featured a disciplined commitment to tax laws that allowed revenues
to keep up with the needs of a growing state without unduly burdening
the very same people most in need of services. For years, North Carolina
managed the neat trick of gradually building its capacity to help those
in need while keeping its taxes comparatively low and progressive. Unfortunately,
in recent years, things have begun to change. Bowing to pressure from
big business and other special interests that no longer recognized their
stake in a more equitable system, lawmakers went on a tax cut binge
throughout the late-1990's. A booming national economy and a series
of quick fixes kept the state afloat for a while, but the bottom fell
out during the current recession.
What
is on the table? The state is constitutionally required to
have a balanced budget. While the House of Representatives has taken
the commendable step of defeating a proposed state lottery that would
have only exacerbated the problem, legislative leaders still intend
to put forth a budget bill that would make up for the shortfall by,
| a) |
raising
the sales tax -- the tax that most affects folks at the lower end
of the economic ladder and |
| b) |
making $1 billion in immediate spending cuts --most of which come
from health, human services and education. |
The
proposal would also direct the Governor to cut another $111 million
as the year goes along.
Why
is that such a bad plan? The central problem with the proposed
"solution" is that it balances the budget on the backs of
the very people who have been most injured by the recession and who
have the least ability to pay more. According to research conducted
by the N.C Budget and Tax Center, the sales tax hike will cost low-income
taxpayers (folks making $8,900 per year or less) six times more, as
a share of their income, than the richest 1% (who average $746,000 per
year). Middle-income taxpayers (with an average income of $31,000) will
pay four times more than the rich. To compound matters, the vast majority
of the spending cuts will come at the expense of critical service programs
that help to blunt the tremendous gap in incomes and wealth that still
persist. In a modern version of medieval medicine, North Carolina leaders
have prescribed a healthy dose of fiscal policy leeches to attack the
disease that afflicts the state's weakest sectors.
What
should be done? Governor Easley and legislative leaders must
stop and reconsider the path they appear to have chosen. Rather than
placing new burdens on the middle class and the poor, they must require
those corporations and wealthy individuals whose incomes have soared
in recent years to pay their fair share of the state tax burden. Simply
closing some loopholes and reinstating the tax cuts doled out to corporations
and the wealthy during the 1990's would bring hundreds of millions of
dollars to state coffers without a fraction of the long-term pain that
will be inflicted by the sales and lottery taxes. If leaders simply
cannot muster the votes to pass the necessary structural reforms, they
should -- at a minimum -- make use of all available existing funds,
such as tobacco settlement dollars and corporate incentive funds before
they put new, regressive taxes permanently in place.
Ultimately,
our leaders must look both to the state's history -- to reexamine the
courageous, far-sighted decisions of so many of their predecessors --
and to its future -- to the time well beyond the next election. They
must realize that the course of politically expedient, stopgap, quick
fixes will only exacerbate North Carolina's problems and mimic the failed
policies that have produced such poor results for so many of our neighbors.
They must advance a budget bill that helps North Carolina reclaim its
progressive heritage of fiscal discipline and shared sacrifice. Now
is the time for our leaders to stop and retrace their steps -- before
that heritage is irretrievably lost.